Top Trademark Wars in the Tech World

Top Trademark Wars in the Tech World

The tech world has seen some of the most heated trademark battles in recent years.

The tech industry is highly competitive and rapidly expanding, with companies competing for both market share and consumer attention. To stand out, they often engage in trademark wars to secure a unique identity. A trademark, recognized by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) as a form of intellectual property (IP), acts as a signature for a business and helps customers distinguish it from competitors. Trademarks can consist of words, phrases, symbols or designs.

However, securing these trademarks can lead to legal battles, ranging from minor disputes over similar-sounding names to major wars between tech giants. The outcome of these trademark wars can greatly impact a ‌company’s reputation, consumer perception and market dominance. In this article, we will take a look at some of the most notable trademark disputes in the tech world.

Apple Computer vs. Apple Corps

Apple Corps, the holding company founded by the Beatles, and Apple Computer (now Apple Inc.), the tech giant known for its Mac computers and iPhones, were embroiled in a trademark dispute that spanned several decades. In 1978, a representative from Apple Corps claimed that the name and logo used by Apple Inc. infringed on their trademark. In 1981, Apple Inc. agreed to pay US$80,000 as part of a legal settlement and not enter the music industry. The dispute reignited in 1991, with Apple Corps accusing the iPhone maker of breaching the terms of their agreement by venturing into the music industry. The lawsuit was resolved in 2007, with Apple Inc. becoming the owner of the “Apple” trademarks and logos and licensing some of the trademarks back to the Apple Corps music company. 

In March 2011, Apple Inc. filed for a trademark ownership of the Beatles’ Granny Smith green apple logo. In 2012, Apple Inc. officially obtained the trademark after successfully opposing a transfer attempt by another company called Apple Box Productions Sub Inc. Although the legal dispute between the two entities officially ended in 2012, it’s impossible to predict whether there will be future battles between Apple Inc. and Apple Corps.

Microsoft Corp. vs.

In 2001, Microsoft Corporation sued San Diego-based software maker Inc. in the U.S. over the similarity between the names Windows, the operating system developed by Microsoft, and Lindows. Microsoft claimed that it infringed on its trademark rights and was likely to confuse consumers. The trademark dispute resulted in legal action in multiple countries, including the U.S., Canada, Finland, Sweden, the Netherlands, France and Spain. 

The trademark dispute was finally resolved in 2004. Lindows won several key decisions in the U.S., while Microsoft had more success in European courts. This ultimately led to a settlement between the two companies, with Microsoft agreeing to pay US$20 million to Lindows in exchange for Lindows renaming itself to Linspire Inc. and discontinuing all use of the Lindows name in its products by September 14 of that year. As part of the settlement, Lindows also agreed to transfer control of several URLs to Microsoft but retained control of its main URLs, and, to redirect users to its new URL until July 2008. 

Apple Inc. vs. Huawei

In 2021, Apple faced a setback when it failed to prevent China’s Huawei from acquiring the “MatePod” trademark. In May 2019, Huawei made attempts to register the “MatePod” and “Huawei Mate Pod” trademarks. Apple challenged these attempts by filing an opposition, but the China National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA) ruled in favor of Huawei, denying Apple’s objections and granting the registrations of Huawei’s trademarks.

As reported by SCMP, Apple argued that the “MatePod” trademark was too similar to its own trademarked product lines, like iPod, earpods and AirPods. The tech giant claimed that Huawei had intentionally and “maliciously” copied its trademark, which could “have harmful impact on society”. 

However, CNIPA found Apple’s arguments unconvincing and granted the “MatePod” trademark to Huawei. Although a decision has already been made, Apple can still challenge the trademark registration by filing further appeals with the CNIPA. 

Google vs. Oracle 

In 2010, software major Oracle filed a lawsuit against Google, alleging that the company’s Android mobile operating system infringed on its patents for the Java programming language. However, Google argued that the development of Android was conducted through a clean room methodology and did not infringe any rights. In the context of Java, a clean room implementation refers to the development of a Java virtual machine that is not based on any existing Java code.

The legal dispute revolves around the usage of approximately 11,500 lines of Java code in the development of Android. Google argues that its use of Java code was protected under the principle of fair use, which would. 

In April 2021, the U.S. Supreme Court handed down a 6-2 majority ruling in favor of Google, determining that Google’s use of Java API code in the creation of its Android was considered fair use and exempted any copyright liability. This ruling was a major victory for Google, allowing it to continue using Java code in developing its software without fear of copyright infringement.

Each of the above cases offers unique insights into the complexities of trademark protection, highlighting the need for early trademarking and the potential consequences of trademark disputes. While costly and time-consuming, these trade battles can serve as valuable reminders for businesses to protect their branding.

Also read:

Header image courtesy of Pexels


Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on email


How AI Threatens Your Password Security

Unlocking the Dangers: How AI Threatens Your Password Security

You may have heard of artificial intelligence (AI) technology’s many cool capabilities, such as assisting doctors or predicting the weather. However, there is something not-so-cool we need to discuss: AI could make our passwords less safe, which is concerning.

What Does Gen-Z Want in a Career

What Does Gen-Z Want in a Career?

Most managers feel that Gen-Z is “difficult to work with”, entitled and easily offended. The prevalent notion is that this generation is prone to distraction, lacks tech skills and is deficient in productivity and motivation. They want to butt heads, have their say and not listen. Harsh, yes. These studies perhaps ignore that most of the Gen-Z workforce graduated and entered the workforce during COVID-19.


Beyond Pink and Blue: The Movement Towards Gender-Inclusive Toys

Before gifting that pink kitchen set for a girl or the transformer for a boy, pause for a moment. Historically, the toy industry has thrived on perpetuating gender stereotypes. As the French essayist and critic, Roland Barthes, expressed, toys are essentially a “microcosm of the adult world”, reflecting societal views.