Facebook Disables Accounts of NYU Researchers Citing Violation of Terms

Facebook

The NYU researchers were analyzing political advertisements on the platform using “Ad Observer” – the tool that concerned Facebook.

On August 3, 2021, Facebook disabled the accounts of a group of NYU researchers. Facebook’s Product Management Director Mike Clark released his statement in a blog post saying, “Today, we disabled the accounts, apps, pages and platform access associated with NYU’s Ad Observatory Project and its operators after our repeated attempts to bring their research into compliance with our Terms.” He added that the company did so to protect its users’ privacy, shining the light on Facebook’s commitment to transparency.

Who are the NYU researchers?

The researchers were part of a project called the “NYU Ad Observatory.” They were studying political ads on Facebook – from how they are formed to how they are targeted. They started this study – with Facebook’s approval – ahead of the 2020 US elections. Concerned that Facebook wasn’t sharing truthful and complete data, they created a tool called “Ad Observer” – a plug-in that allows users to share anonymous information. It includes information, like the categories, gender and keywords, about the ads displayed to them.

Laura Edelson, the lead researcher of the project, shared, “Using data collected through Ad Observer, and also data collected using the transparency tools Facebook makes available to researchers, we’ve been able to help the public understand how the platform fails to live up to its promises and shed light on how it sells the attention of its users to advertisers.” She added that the company failed to display many advertisements in their public archives.

The case of Ad Observer and the company’s terms of service

As per Facebook’s terms of service, a user may not “access or collect data from our products using automated means (without our prior permission) or attempt to access data you do not have permission to access.” Clark asserted that the research team was informed beforehand that Ad Observer does not comply with the company’s policies. But the researchers denied the claims that they were exploiting users’ private data.

Edelson declared, “All of these claims are wrong. Ad Observer collects information only about advertisers, not about our volunteers or their friends, and the FTC (Federal Trade Commission) has stated that our research does not violate its consent decree with Facebook.”

She added that the social media networking company was trying to silence the team because their work often turns the attention to problems on its platform. In an emailed statement, she said, “Worst of all, Facebook is using user privacy, a core belief that we have always put first in our work, as a pretext for doing this.” According to her, this event shows that Facebook should not have the power to determine who is allowed to study them. It should be open to all.

Facebook’s turbulent history with user privacy

Facebook has come under fire for various data scandals over the years. In 2018, the Cambridge Analytica scandal brought to light data concerns as data of over 87 million users was exposed without their consent. Recently, US Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, while discussing the role of Facebook in the US Capitol Attack of January 6, 2021, said that the company has formerly had a “complete lack of accountability” to democracy.

Despite the criticism Facebook faced for disabling the accounts of the researchers, Facebook stands by its decision.

Header Image by Flickr

SHARE THIS STORY

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on email
Alinda Gupta
I am a professional journalist and gourmand with an inexplicable love for caffeine. I admire old architecture and find comfort in fiction books. I am also an A1-level certified French speaker—bonne journée!

RELATED POSTS

What Is the Best Business Model for an Online Food Delivery Startup

What Is the Best Business Model for an Online Food Delivery Startup?

As per a McKinsey report, the food delivery business was worth over US$150 billion in 2021. The global food delivery markets are four to seven times larger than they were in 2018. Every day, more and more people rely on apps to get their food delivered home. It is convenient, fast and affordable for customers.

Are DAOs the Future of Work and Startups

Are DAOs the Future of Work and Startups?

In August 2021, India-based blockchain startup Polygon decided to build the country’s first decentralized autonomous organization (DAO)—an organization run by its members, without any leader, on a blockchain. With the DAO, the startup aims to give users decision-making power to influence and even map out the startup’s future.

Why Is OpenSea Worth US$13 Billion

Why Is OpenSea Worth US$13 Billion?

Online non-fungible token (NFT) marketplace OpenSea is now worth US$13 billion, following a new investment of US$300 million in a Series C finance round led by hedge fund sponsors Paradigm and Coatue. Half a year ago, OpenSea was only valued at US$1.5 billion.

Why Is the IMF Concerned about Cryptocurrency

Why Is the IMF Concerned about Cryptocurrency?

With the crypto market hitting US$3 trillion as of November 2021, it is almost impossible not to believe that we are amid a crypto boom. While investors and miners might be excited about the rising interest in crypto, there are some who do not see this as a positive step.

How Do Crypto Liquidity Pools Work

How Do Crypto Liquidity Pools Work?

Be it for startups launching Initial DEX Offerings (IDOs) on decentralized exchanges (DEX) or cryptocurrency traders—liquidity pools have become indispensable. Liquidity pools are the virtual places where trading happens and companies make money. Before understanding their mechanism, let’s take a look at what they are.