Working in a COVID-19 World

Working in a COVID-19 World

By David Wong

Booqed survey finds demand for flexible workspace on the rise

This week, we had an inquiry for a company seeking to urgently relocate its call center to an alternative location as part of its COVID-19 contingency plans. The question was similar to many we have received over the past two months and is just the tip of the iceberg.

It goes without saying that the COVID-19 virus outbreak has impacted everyday life, from how we interact with each other, to attendance at events, to how we work.

We talk about this as being a ‘VUCA’ moment: a time of volatility, uncertainty, complexity, and ambiguity. Businesses have had to quickly implement measures to overcome the management challenges during this time of uncertainty and to ensure business continuity.

In an online survey BOOQED conducted at the end of February with 60 senior managers responsible for their companies’ workspace decisions, 60% of them confirmed that the virus outbreak had significantly impacted work patterns.

Companies are exploring alternative workspaces to split teams or move teams to interim premises as a response to circumstances like lockdowns or employee infections. They are also interested in alternative workspaces for employees who are unable to work from home. This shift is evident in the surge of inquiries for flexible workspace.

This increased interest in flexible workspaces may also be due to businesses looking to overcome the lack of collaboration between team members working remotely from home and the lack of Internet/information security when working from home or in public spaces–factors cited in the survey.

Some companies are also exploring flexible workspace as a way to tighten their belts when the economic outlook is so bleak. Flexible workspace allows for shorter tenures and is more cost-efficient, so businesses are not burdened with traditional multiple-year office lease terms. It also allows them to increase their space needs when times improve, or down-size should the economic environment get worse.

This boost in demand for flexible workspace is consistent with the survey findings, where 39% of respondents said that management requirements for workspace have changed. 49% of respondents also said that their employees’ expectations for workspace have changed, and 61% of respondents believe that it is highly likely that their employees will need to work remotely more often in 2020.

Looking ahead, the three priorities cited by the survey respondents for workspace are:

  1. Flexibility
  2. Security
  3. Digital infrastructure

In addition to flexibility in lease terms from one hour to 12 months, and the configuration of office from collaboration set-ups to hot desks and private offices, there is also flexibility in locations. Companies planning for better business continuity may select multiple sites across the country. Hence, employees need not commute too far in the event of a need to work from an alternative location.

In terms of security and digital infrastructure, flexible workspaces offer a ‘plug and play’ solution, where companies can move in and get to work immediately. Flexible workspaces also offer greater Internet security, where companies can implement additional security protocols within the flexible workspace.

This pandemic has accelerated companies’ adoption of flexible workspace, and there is also a greater appreciation that flexible workspace applies to all companies, not just for start-ups.

We may not be able to “cancel 2020” as NBA player Lebron James said. But even as the pandemic unfolds and no one can predict when it will be over or if it will be the future norm, there is no better time than now for companies to reevaluate their workspace needs and priorities.

About the Author

David is the Co-Founder and CEO of BOOQED. BOOQED is a digital marketplace for clients to find and landlords to monetize short-term unused business spaces. BOOQED’s mission is to make every space accessible and productive for business.

booqed.com

SHARE THIS STORY

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on email

RELATED POSTS

SEC Compares Crypto

SEC Compares Crypto to “The Wild West”

On September 14, Gary Gensler, the Chairman of U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), said that he doesn’t see long-term viability for cryptocurrency. He emphasized the importance of regulating crypto and protecting the interests of investors.

TikTok over Privacy Concerns

Ireland Launches Investigation into TikTok over Privacy Concerns

On September 14, 2021, Ireland’s Data Protection Commission (DPC) launched an investigation into Bytedance-owned TikTok, the popular video sharing app. This investigation comes as TikTok is already facing backlash regarding data privacy concerns. To know more about the app’s highs and lows in 2020, check out this article.

Facebook Cross Check

What Is Facebook’s Cross Check System and How Does It Work?

On September 13, 2021, Wall Street Journal (WSJ) came out with a detailed investigation surrounding Facebook’s content policies titled, “The Facebook Files”. Learn more about the incident here. What jumped out from this investigation was that the “X-check” or cross-check program used by Facebook, which allegedly gives some of the company’s high-profile users special treatment.

Is Telegram the New Dark Web

Is Telegram the New Dark Web?

Every minute, nearly US$3 million is lost to cybercrime. And by 2025, cybercrime is set to cost the world over US$10 trillion. That cybercrime demands our immediate attention is evident. Cybercrimes are becoming easier and more prominent than ever before. A 2019 Global Data Risk Report revealed that, on average, only 5% of companies have properly protected their folders.

How Facebook Has Failed to Administer Its Own Policies

How Facebook Has Failed to Administer Its Own Policies

Social media giant Facebook finds itself making headlines now and then. The recent one is related to Facebook spending the equivalent of 319 years labeling or removing false and misleading content posted in the U.S. during last year. According to internal documents accessed by the Wall Street Journal, the employees at the social media company have raised concerns about the spread of harmful and misleading information on its platforms.